<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 79th Academy Awards Poster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-79th-academy-awards-poster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/the-79th-academy-awards-poster/</link>
	<description>A movie news and review blog from b5media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:45:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar-skivebom #2 &#171; Speilet</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/the-79th-academy-awards-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar-skivebom #2 &#171; Speilet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/the-79th-academy-awards-poster/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>[...] jeg har sett. Dette lukter gutterom, Photoshop på lavt nivå, dårlig smak og tidlig 90-tall. Mens fjorårets poster var enkel og fin, er dette synet vi møter i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] jeg har sett. Dette lukter gutterom, Photoshop på lavt nivå, dårlig smak og tidlig 90-tall. Mens fjorårets poster var enkel og fin, er dette synet vi møter i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
