<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Gecko &#187; star trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmgecko.com/tag/star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmgecko.com</link>
	<description>A movie news and review blog from b5media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Star Trek 2&#8217; to explore new worlds in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-2-to-explore-new-worlds-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-2-to-explore-new-worlds-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action/Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Sequels & Prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex kurtzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob orci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan burk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoe saldana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-2-to-explore-new-worlds-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Not surprisingly, given the love that fans showed “Star Trek” last year (not to mention $257 million at the box office), it looks like a sequel to the reboot is already in a go mode. Let’s get real; it was probably in a go mode before the movie even hit theaters. 
Zoe Saldana, who played communications diva Uhura, recently told MTV.com that J.J. Abrams is in the process of fleshing out a storyline for the sequel. 
&#34;I spoke to J.J. and Bryan Burk, his producing partner at Bad Robot,&#34; Saldana said, “and they are still in the middle of [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://filmgecko.com/files/2010/01/star_trek_april1.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px;border-left: 0px;margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px;border-top: 0px;border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="star_trek_april1" align="left" src="http://filmgecko.com/files/2010/01/star_trek_april1_thumb.jpg" width="254" height="175" /></a> Not surprisingly, given the love that fans showed <a href="http://www.star trek.com">“Star Trek”</a> last year (not to mention $257 million at the box office), it looks like a sequel to the reboot is already in a go mode. Let’s get real; it was probably in a go mode before the movie even hit theaters. </p>
<p>Zoe Saldana, who played communications diva Uhura, recently told <a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1628750/story.jhtml">MTV.com</a> that <a href="http://www.j-j-abrams.com/">J.J. Abrams</a> is in the process of fleshing out a storyline for the sequel. </p>
<p>&quot;I spoke to J.J. and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/bryan-burk/2184862/main">Bryan Burk</a>, his producing partner at Bad Robot,&quot; Saldana said, “and they are still in the middle of building the script with <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/alex-kurtzman/2070902/main">Alex Kurtzman</a> and Bob Orci.” </p>
<p>She added that they’ll likely go into pre-production at the end of 2010, meaning moviegoers could be buying tickets for the next movie by Christmas of 2011. </p>
<p>Happy news? I say yes! </p>
<p><em>Image: Paramount Pictures</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-2-to-explore-new-worlds-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kurtzman and Orci ponder Star Trek sequel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/kurtzman-and-orci-ponder-star-trek-sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/kurtzman-and-orci-ponder-star-trek-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action/Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coming Soon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Sequels & Prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex kurtzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roberto orci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/kurtzman-and-orci-ponder-star-trek-sequel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Looks like we’ll have to wait a few years for the next “Star Trek” movie, but it’s definitely in the works. 
At the 2009 Screenwriting Expo, taking place right now through tomorrow in Los Angeles, ComingSoon.net asked “Star Trek” writers Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci (pictured) whether they could offer any updates on a sequel. 
&#34;We&#8217;re rereading some of our favorite ‘Star Trek’ novels now and watching the original series again. The honest answer is we don&#8217;t know yet,&#34; Orci said. &#34;We think it&#8217;s going to be a 2012 release, but I&#8217;m not sure.”
Added Kurtzman, “Originally, we thought we [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/roberto_orci_alex_kurtzman_INFphoto_707639.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px;border-left: 0px;margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px;border-top: 0px;border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci " align="left" src="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/roberto_orci_alex_kurtzman_INFphoto_707639_thumb.jpg" width="254" height="414" /></a> Looks like we’ll have to wait a few years for the next <a href="http://www.star trek.com">“Star Trek”</a> movie, but it’s definitely in the works. </p>
<p>At the 2009 Screenwriting Expo, taking place right now through tomorrow in Los Angeles, <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60126">ComingSoon.net</a> asked “Star Trek” writers Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci (pictured) whether they could offer any updates on a sequel. </p>
<p>&quot;We&#8217;re rereading some of our favorite ‘Star Trek’ novels now and watching the original series again. The honest answer is we don&#8217;t know yet,&quot; Orci said. &quot;We think it&#8217;s going to be a 2012 release, but I&#8217;m not sure.”</p>
<p>Added Kurtzman, “Originally, we thought we were going to have to have the script in by Christmas, but the release changed so certainly within the next eight months I&#8217;d say.”</p>
<p>As for where the story will go, Orci said, “They&#8217;re established now in the second movie and they&#8217;re finally a crew so it will resemble what you see in terms of they are already who they are.”</p>
<p>Orci and Kurtzman have also recently returned to TV, working on “<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/fringe/">Fringe</a>” with their old pal <a href="http://www.j-j-abrams.com/">J.J. Abrams</a>, whom they wrote for on “Alias.” “When J.J. said he wanted to create a show with me, it&#8217;s like &#8216;Screw you buddy,&#8217;&quot; Orci joked. </p>
<p>“Also, he had studio commitments to Warner Brothers and we wanted him to direct ‘<a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">Star Trek</a>.’ We feared he wouldn&#8217;t be able to do it if we didn&#8217;t help fulfill those obligations, so we did. We wanted him to be as focused on it as he could be on that so we&#8217;re like, we&#8217;ll absolutely help you. We would have done it anyway, but also it freed him up to do ‘Star Trek.’”</p>
<p>Hmmm … there are plenty of ways for a sequel to go. Just off the top of my head, a few characters that might be featured include Harry Mudd, the Gorn, or Khan. Any ideas what you’d like to see in a sequel?</p>
<p><em>Image: <i><a href="http://www.infdaily.com/">INF</a></i>; Source: </em><a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60126"><em>ComingSoon.net</em></a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/kurtzman-and-orci-ponder-star-trek-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Roddenberry&#8217;s Genesis II and Planet Earth on DVD today!</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/gene-roddenberrys-genesis-ii-and-planet-earth-on-dvd-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/gene-roddenberrys-genesis-ii-and-planet-earth-on-dvd-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action/Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Sequels & Prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now on Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now on DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex cord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diana muldaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john saxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner archive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/gene-roddenberrys-genesis-ii-and-planet-earth-on-dvd-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I’ll preface this post by saying I’m a big fan of anything “Star Trek” (thanks to my Trekkie mom), so I was thrilled to learn that Warner Archive would be releasing Gene Roddenberry’s 1970’s TV pilots, “Genesis II” and the follow-up “Planet Earth” on DVD today. 
GENESIS II, 74 minutes, 1973. “My name is Dylan Hunt. My story begins the day on which I died.” Set between now and the era of the starship Enterprise, this story follows Hunt (Alex Cord), who awakens after 154 years of suspended animation into a post-apocalyptic world that’s torn between the peace-loving citizens [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/Gensis_II.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px;border-left: 0px;margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px;border-top: 0px;border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="D500" align="left" src="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/Gensis_II_thumb.jpg" width="204" height="290" /></a> I’ll preface this post by saying I’m a big fan of anything <strong>“</strong><a href="http://www.startrek.com/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a><strong>”</strong> (thanks to my Trekkie mom), so I was thrilled to learn that <a href="http://www.warnerarchive.com"><strong>Warner Archive</strong></a> would be releasing Gene Roddenberry’s 1970’s TV pilots, <strong>“</strong><a href="http://www.wbshop.com/Genesis-II-+1973+EST-MOD/1000116213,default,pd.html"><strong>Genesis II</strong></a><strong>”</strong> and the follow-up <strong>“</strong><a href="http://www.wbshop.com/Planet-Earth-+1974+EST-MOD/1000116418,default,pd.html"><strong>Planet Earth</strong></a><strong>”</strong> on DVD today. </p>
<p><b>GENESIS II, 74 minutes, 1973. </b>“My name is Dylan Hunt. My story begins the day on which I died.” Set between now and the era of the starship <i>Enterprise</i>, this story follows Hunt (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0179376/"><strong>Alex Cord</strong></a>), who awakens after 154 years of suspended animation into a post-apocalyptic world that’s torn between the peace-loving citizens of Pax and the militaristic, mutant Tyranians. Both want Hunt to join their cause. But the Tyranians have two cruel weapons to persuade Hunt: a device of torture called a stim. And an alluring mutant (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0366866/"><strong>Mariette Hartley</strong></a>) with two navels … and one ice-cold heart. </p>
<p><b></b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/Planet_Earth.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px;border-left: 0px;margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px;border-top: 0px;border-right: 0px" border="0" alt="D500" align="right" src="http://filmgecko.com/files/2009/10/Planet_Earth_thumb.jpg" width="204" height="290" /></a> Planet Earth, 74 minutes, 1974. </b>The time is the 22nd century. The place is the Confederacy, a matriarchy where men are enslaved and impotent. The hero is Dylan Hunt (John Saxon), a handsome 20th century scientist awakened from suspended animation – just the “breeder” a Confederacy dominatrix (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0611707/"><strong>Diana Muldaur</strong></a>, who went on to play Dr. Pulaski in “Star Trek: The Next Generation”) has been waiting for! In this sequel to “Genesis II,” Gene Roddenberry puts a reverse spin on women’s lib in an action-filled tale set in a gleaming world of futuristic cities, underground sub shuttles, palm-sized computers and skintight uniforms. Can Hunt defy the Confederacy and free his downtrodden fellow males, or is he doomed to slavery on “Planet Earth”? </p>
<p>Plenty of 1970s-era goodness in these two DVDs! If you’re a fan of the “<a href="http://www.star trek.com">Star Trek</a>” universe or Gene Roddenberry, they’re definitely worth a look. </p>
</p>
<p><em>Images: Warner Archive</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/gene-roddenberrys-genesis-ii-and-planet-earth-on-dvd-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transformers rules box office &#8211; June 26-28, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/transformers-rules-at-box-office-june-26-28-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/transformers-rules-at-box-office-june-26-28-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[away we go movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office mojo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my sister's keeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night at the museum: battle of the smithsonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the taking of pelham 123]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers revenge of the fallen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/transformers-rules-at-box-office-june-26-28-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The weekend box office numbers are not all that shocking. &#34;Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen&#34; is miles ahead of everything else, with &#34;The Proposal&#34; coming in second, and &#34;My Sister&#8217;s Keeper&#34; a distant fifth. 
Maybe people are like me and don&#8217;t want to go see a sad movie right now. My daughter wants to see it, and I&#8217;m just not into it! Here are the numbers from Box Office Mojo: 

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, $108.96M
The Proposal, $18.57M
The Hangover, $17.02M
Up, $13.06M
My Sister&#8217;s Keeper, $12.44M
Year One, $6.02M
The Taking of Pelham 123, $5.45M
Star Trek, $3.71M
Night at the Museum: Battle of the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/transformers-revenge-posterw500h9501.jpg"><img style="margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px" height="301" alt="Transformers_Revenge_poster-w500-h950" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/transformers-revenge-posterw500h950-thumb.jpg" width="204" align="right" border="0" /></a> The weekend box office numbers are not all that shocking. <a href="http://www.transformersmovie.com/"><strong>&quot;Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen&quot;</strong></a> is miles ahead of everything else, with <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-proposal-review-betty-white-rocksitout/"><strong>&quot;The Proposal&quot;</strong></a> coming in second, and <a href="http://www.mysisterskeepermovie.com/"><strong>&quot;My Sister&#8217;s Keeper&quot;</strong></a> a distant fifth. </p>
<p>Maybe people are like me and don&#8217;t want to go see a sad movie right now. My daughter wants to see it, and I&#8217;m just not into it! Here are the numbers from <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=26&amp;p=.htm"><strong>Box Office Mojo</strong></a>: </p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen-review-special-fx-take-center-stage/"><strong>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</strong></a>, $108.96M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-proposal-review-betty-white-rocksitout/"><strong>The Proposal</strong></a>, $18.57M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/tag/the-hangover-movie/"><strong>The Hangover</strong></a>, $17.02M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/up-review-sweet-and-up-lifting/"><strong>Up</strong></a>, $13.06M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mysisterskeepermovie.com/"><strong>My Sister&#8217;s Keeper</strong></a>, $12.44M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/year-one-new-clip-with-jack-black-michael-cera/"><strong>Year One</strong></a>, $6.02M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-taking-of-pelham-123-preview-trailer/"><strong>The Taking of Pelham 123</strong></a>, $5.45M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a>, $3.71M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/night-at-the-museum-battle-of-the-smithsonian-review/"><strong>Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian</strong></a>, $3.64M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/away-we-go-preview-trailer-images/"><strong>Away We Go</strong></a>, $1.70M</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Image: © 2009 DW Studios L.L.C. and Paramount Pictures Corporation. All Rights Reserved.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/transformers-rules-at-box-office-june-26-28-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hangover still tops at box office &#8211; June 12-14, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/the-hangover-still-tops-at-box-office-june-12-14-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/the-hangover-still-tops-at-box-office-june-12-14-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angels and demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drag me to hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagine that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land of the lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night at the museum: battle of the smithsonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the taking of pelham 123]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/the-hangover-still-tops-at-box-office-june-12-14-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “The Hangover” is a smart, funny movie, and audiences are liking it, too. The buddy flick scored high at the box office this weekend, even though it’s been out for two weeks. Here’s the rundown from Box Office Mojo: 

The Hangover, $32.79M
Up, $30.76M
The Taking of Pelham 123, $23.37M
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian, $9.61M
Land of the Lost, $8.99M
Imagine That, $5.50M
Star Trek, $5.45M
Terminator: Salvation, $4.78M
Angels &#38; Demons, $4.11M
Drag Me to Hell, $3.93M

Images: TM and (c) 2008 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Post from: Film Gecko
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/the-hangover-poster.jpg"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px" height="312" alt="the_hangover_poster" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/the-hangover-poster-thumb.jpg" width="204" align="right" border="0" /></a> “The Hangover” is a smart, funny movie, and audiences are liking it, too. The buddy flick scored high at the box office this weekend, even though it’s been out for two weeks. Here’s the rundown from <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=24&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>: </p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/tag/the-hangover-movie/">The Hangover</a>, $32.79M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/up-review-sweet-and-up-lifting/">Up</a>, $30.76M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-taking-of-pelham-123-preview-trailer/">The Taking of Pelham 123</a>, $23.37M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/night-at-the-museum-battle-of-the-smithsonian-review/">Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian</a>, $9.61M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/land-of-the-lost-review-cg-effects-steal-the-show/">Land of the Lost</a>, $8.99M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/imagine-that-predictable-but-sweet/">Imagine That</a>, $5.50M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">Star Trek</a>, $5.45M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/terminator-salvation-review-explosive-mix-of-old-and-new/">Terminator: Salvation</a>, $4.78M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/angels-demons-review-a-mix-of-talk-and-action/">Angels &amp; Demons</a>, $4.11M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/drag-me-to-hell-trailer-and-tv-spots/">Drag Me to Hell</a>, $3.93M</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Images: TM and (c) 2008 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/the-hangover-still-tops-at-box-office-june-12-14-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek: Everything Old is New Again (on DVD, that is)</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-everything-old-is-new-again-on-dvd-that-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-everything-old-is-new-again-on-dvd-that-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action/Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now on DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV on the Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best of star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek the next generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek: the original series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/test-post/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ With the success of the new “Star Trek” movie, we’re seeing all the vintage “Star Trek” shows in a new light. Or maybe an old light with a new lightbulb. Or something.
At any rate, I’m a “Star Trek” fan from way back, and it’s fun to see people take an interest in the TV shows. Personally, “Star Trek: The Next Generation” is my favorite, although “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” is extremely underrated. Really, they’re all good in their own way.
Now we have two new sets out, released on DVD May 12, 2009:
The Best of Star Trek: The Original [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/star-trek-original-series.jpg"><img style="margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/star-trek-original-series-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="star_trek_original_series" width="204" height="290" align="right" /></a> With the success of the new <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">“Star Trek”</a> movie, we’re seeing all the vintage “Star Trek” shows in a new light. Or maybe an old light with a new lightbulb. Or something.</p>
<p>At any rate, I’m a “Star Trek” fan from way back, and it’s fun to see people take an interest in the TV shows. Personally, “Star Trek: The Next Generation” is my favorite, although “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” is extremely underrated. Really, they’re all good in their own way.</p>
<p>Now we have two new sets out, released on DVD May 12, 2009:</p>
<p><strong>The Best of Star Trek: The Original Series (1 disc, 201 minutes, buy it on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-Star-Trek-Original/dp/B001TH16CO/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1244013681&amp;sr=1-8">Amazon</a>).</strong> While this set only offers four episodes of the original series, they’re four of the best:</p>
<p><strong>1) “The Trouble With Tribbles”</strong> brings those cute Tribbles to the Enterprise, showing that you can indeed have too much of a cute thing. Elsewhere, a barroom brawl with Klingons takes center stage.</p>
<p><span id="more-13043"></span></p>
<p><strong>2) In &#8220;The City on the Edge of Forever&#8221;,</strong> Kirk, Spock and McCoy are sent back to the 1930s to try and save the future. In the process, Kirk falls in love with Joan Collins!</p>
<p><strong>3) “Balance of Terror”</strong> gives a first look at the Romulans and their awesome cloaking device. But these new enemies are a lot like the Vulcans, and the Enterprise crew starts to mistrust Spock.</p>
<p><strong>4) In “Amok Time,”</strong> the usually logical Mr. Spock loses all emotional control when he returns home to Vulcan to consummate his arranged marriage. Somehow, it all boils down to a fight-to-the-death between Spock and Kirk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/star-trek-next-generation.jpg"><img style="margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/06/star-trek-next-generation-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="star_trek_next_generation" width="204" height="288" align="right" /></a> The Best of Star Trek: The Next Generation (1 disc, 181 minutes, buy it on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-Star-Trek-Next-Generation/dp/B001TH16CE/ref=ntt_tv_ep_opt_002">Amazon</a>).</strong> Again, only four episodes here, which probably aren’t enough to satisfy diehard fans, but they’re a good introduction for Star Trek: TNG newbies:</p>
<p><strong>1) “Best of Both Worlds, Part 1”</strong> gives us our first look at the Borg and their ominous Cube. In my view, the Borg were way worse than the Romulans. Ok, maybe not worse, just a different sort of collective evil.</p>
<p><strong>2) In “Best of Both Worlds, Part 2,”</strong> Riker takes over as captain, since Picard is still “assimilated” into the Borg world. Still, he manages to offer a single clue to the Enterprise crew: “Sleep.”</p>
<p><strong>3) “Yesterday’s Enterprise”</strong> finds the crew dealing with a severe space-time continuum that takes the ship 22 years into the future. It’s one of the two episodes that features two different versions of the Enterprise.</p>
<p><strong>4) “The Measure of a Man”</strong> brings home the question of whether Data is a man or just a robot. Picard fights for the former, and calls a hearing to prove it.</p>
<p><em>Images: Amazon.com</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-everything-old-is-new-again-on-dvd-that-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Museum Takes Box Office &#8211; May 22-25, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/museum-takes-box-office-may-22-25-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/museum-takes-box-office-may-22-25-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17 again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angels and demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance flick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghosts of girlfriends past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsters vs aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night at the museum: battle of the smithsonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsessed movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-men origins: wolverine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/museum-takes-box-office-may-22-25-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tops at the box office this weekend was &#34;Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.&#34; I wasn&#8217;t that crazy about the movie (read my review here), but it&#8217;s the only new family flick out right now, which is why I think it scored high. It wasn&#8217;t bad; just wasn&#8217;t as good as the first movie. Take a peek at the numbers from Box Office Mojo: 

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian, $70M
Terminator Salvation, $53.82M
Star Trek, $29.40M
Angels &#38; Demons, $27.70M
Dance Flick, $13.10M
X-Men Origins: Wolverine, $10.10M
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, $4.83M
Obsessed, $2.50M
Monsters vs. Aliens, $1.90M
17 Again, $1.28M

Images: TM and [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/night-museum-smithsonian-poster.jpg"><img title="night_museum_smithsonian_poster" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="302" alt="night_museum_smithsonian_poster" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/night-museum-smithsonian-poster-thumb.jpg" width="204" align="right" border="0" /></a> Tops at the box office this weekend was <strong>&quot;Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.&quot;</strong> I wasn&#8217;t that crazy about the movie (read my review <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/night-at-the-museum-battle-of-the-smithsonian-review/">here</a>), but it&#8217;s the only new family flick out right now, which is why I think it scored high. It wasn&#8217;t bad; just wasn&#8217;t as good as the first movie. Take a peek at the numbers from <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=21a&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>: </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/night-at-the-museum-battle-of-the-smithsonian-review/">Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian</a>, $70M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/terminator-salvation-review-explosive-mix-of-old-and-new/">Terminator Salvation</a>, $53.82M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">Star Trek</a>, $29.40M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/angels-demons-review-a-mix-of-talk-and-action/">Angels &amp; Demons</a>, $27.70M</li>
<li><a href="http://thedanceflick.com/">Dance Flick</a>, $13.10M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/x-men-origins-wolverine-review-its-all-about-hugh-jackmans-muscles/">X-Men Origins: Wolverine</a>, $10.10M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/ghosts-of-girlfriends-past-preview-trailer/">Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</a>, $4.83M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/obsessed-2-clips-including-the-beyonce-ali-larter-catfight/">Obsessed</a>, $2.50M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/monsters-vs-aliens-review-awesome-3d-animation/">Monsters vs. Aliens</a>, $1.90M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/17-again-review-sweet-and-funny/">17 Again</a>, $1.28M</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Images: TM and © Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. All Rights Reserved.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/museum-takes-box-office-may-22-25-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shatner, Khan in Star Trek sequel?</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/shatner-khan-in-star-trek-sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/shatner-khan-in-star-trek-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action/Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Sequels & Prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now on DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex kurtzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capt. kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gael garcia bernal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james t kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[khan noonien singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricardo montalban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert orci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruben blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek sequel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wrath of khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william shatner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/shatner-khan-in-star-trek-sequel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ After the stellar box office numbers of &#34;Star Trek&#34; last week ($75.20 million), it&#8217;s no surprise that the word &#34;sequel&#34; is being bandied about. And J.J. Abrams says he&#8217;s open to the idea of William Shatner and/or Khan being in the next movie. 
&#34;The fun of this [new alternate 'Trek' reality] is that the destiny of these characters is in their hands — it&#8217;s not constrained by the pre-existing films or TV series,&#34; Abrams told MTV News. &#34;Believe me, whether it&#8217;s William Shatner or Khan &#8230; it would be ridiculous to not be open to those ideas.&#34; 
If you&#8217;ve [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/william-shatner-infphoto-767805.jpg"><img title="William Shatner" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="320" alt="William Shatner" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/william-shatner-infphoto-767805-thumb.jpg" width="229" align="right" border="0" /></a> After the <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-rules-box-office-universe-may-8-10-2009/">stellar box office numbers</a> of <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">&quot;Star Trek&quot;</a> last week ($75.20 million), it&#8217;s no surprise that the word &quot;sequel&quot; is being bandied about. And <a href="http://www.j-j-abrams.com/">J.J. Abrams</a> says he&#8217;s open to the idea of <a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1611523/story.jhtml">William Shatner and/or Khan being in the next movie.</a> </p>
<p>&quot;The fun of this [new alternate 'Trek' reality] is that the destiny of these characters is in their hands — it&#8217;s not constrained by the pre-existing films or TV series,&quot; Abrams told MTV News. &quot;Believe me, whether it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.williamshatner.com/">William Shatner</a> or Khan &#8230; it would be ridiculous to not be open to those ideas.&quot; </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve seen the new movie, you know there&#8217;s an alternative timeline involved in the story. Sure, Capt. Kirk died in a previous film, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he can&#8217;t come back to life in future movies. </p>
<p> <span id="more-11155"></span>
<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/gael-garcia-bernal-infphoto-782905.jpg"><img title="Gael Garcia Bernal" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="342" alt="Gael Garcia Bernal" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/gael-garcia-bernal-infphoto-782905-thumb.jpg" width="229" align="right" border="0" /></a>And what of Khan Noonien Singh, the evil villain played by Ricardo Montalban in previous films, including &quot;The Wrath of Khan&quot;? Abrams says he may NOT have been stuck on Ceti Alpha V. You know, different timelines and all. Writer/producers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman are already talking about bringing Khan back. </p>
<p>Who would play him, though? How about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001952/">Ruben Blades</a>? Or maybe <a href="http://www.gaelgarciabernal.org/">Gael Garcia Bernal</a> (pictured)? I guess they wouldn&#8217;t have to be of Latin descent, unless the filmmakers follow along the Ricardo Montalban ethnicity. </p>
<p>Of course, who knows when or if a sequel will be made. Says Abrams, &quot;We&#8217;re all still coming down from making this movie.&quot; I can imagine! </p>
<p><i>Images: <a href="http://www.infdaily.com/">INF</a>; William Shatner, Runway For Life Gala benefiting St. Jude Children&#8217;s Reserach Hospital, Beverly Hilton Hotel, Los Angeles, CA, Oct. 11, 2008; Gael Garcia Bernal, Premiere of 8, 2008 Rome Film Festival, Oct. 23, 2008.</i></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/shatner-khan-in-star-trek-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s another Tyler Perry movie! And here&#8217;s the trailer!</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/its-another-tyler-perry-movie-and-heres-the-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/its-another-tyler-perry-movie-and-heres-the-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coming Soon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Sequels & Prequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music & Musicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i can do bad all by myself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i can do bad all by myself trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lionsgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madea movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyler perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyler perry movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/its-another-tyler-perry-movie-and-heres-the-trailer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tyler Perry continues to rule the universe with his steady stream of self-written, directed and produced movies (And you know what? More power to him!). That&#8217;s not all he does, though; he&#8217;s also in theaters playing Admiral Richard Barnett in &#34;Star Trek.&#34;&#160;
Perry&#8217;s latest movie is &#34;I Can Do Bad All By Myself&#34; from Lionsgate, and the trailer premiered on TylerPerry.com yesterday. 
It brings back everyone&#8217;s favorite pistol-packin&#8217; grandma Madea, who catches 16-year-old Jennifer and her two younger brothers looting her home (bad move on their part). So Madea decides to take charge and deliver the delinquents to their only [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/tyler-perry-madea.jpg"><img title="tyler_perry_madea" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="331" alt="tyler_perry_madea" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/tyler-perry-madea-thumb.jpg" width="254" align="right" border="0" /></a> <strong>Tyler Perry</strong> continues to rule the universe with his steady stream of self-written, directed and produced movies (And you know what? More power to him!). That&#8217;s not all he does, though; he&#8217;s also in theaters playing Admiral Richard Barnett in <a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/"><strong>&quot;Star Trek.&quot;</strong></a>&#160;</p>
<p>Perry&#8217;s latest movie is <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1385912/"><strong>&quot;I Can Do Bad All By Myself&quot;</strong></a> from <a href="http://lionsgate.com/?section=film">Lionsgate</a>, and the trailer premiered on <a href="http://tylerperry.com/premiere/bad.php"><strong>TylerPerry.com</strong></a> yesterday. </p>
<p>It brings back everyone&#8217;s favorite pistol-packin&#8217; grandma Madea, who catches 16-year-old Jennifer and her two younger brothers looting her home (bad move on their part). So Madea decides to take charge and deliver the delinquents to their only relative: their Aunt April.</p>
<p>April is a hard-drinking nightclub singer who lives off her married boyfriend Raymond and wants nothing to do with the kids. But that all changes when a handsome Mexican immigrant named Sandino moves into April&#8217;s basement and challenges her to leave her old ways behind. </p>
<p>&quot;I Can Do Bad All By Myself&quot; hits theaters Sept. 11, 2009. Check out <a href="http://tylerperry.com/premiere/bad.php">the trailer here</a>. </p>
<p><em>Image: </em><a href="http://lionsgate.com/?section=film"><em>Lionsgate</em></a><em> Films</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/its-another-tyler-perry-movie-and-heres-the-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek rules box office universe &#8211; May 8-10, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-rules-box-office-universe-may-8-10-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-rules-box-office-universe-may-8-10-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Boursaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Now Playing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17 again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghosts of girlfriends past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hannah montana: the movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsters vs aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next day air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsessed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the soloist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-men origins: wolverine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-rules-box-office-universe-may-8-10-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s no surprise to anyone that &#34;Star Trek&#34; ruled the box office universe this weekend, beating &#34;Wolverine&#34; by a million light-years. Here&#8217;s the scoop from Box Office Mojo: 

Star Trek, $75.20M
X-Men Origins: Wolverine, $26.40M
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, $10.25M
Obsessed, $6.56M
17 Again, $4.23M
Next Day Air, $4.11M
The Soloist, $3.94M
Monsters vs. Aliens, $3.26M
Earth, $2.66M
Hannah Montana: The Movie, $2.19M

Image: © Paramount Pictures
Post from: Film Gecko
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/star-trek-chris-pine-poster.jpg"><img title="star_trek_chris_pine_poster" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 10px 0px 10px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="301" alt="star_trek_chris_pine_poster" src="http://www.filmgecko.com/files/2009/05/star-trek-chris-pine-poster-thumb.jpg" width="204" align="right" border="0" /></a> I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s no surprise to anyone that <a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/">&quot;Star Trek&quot;</a> ruled the box office universe this weekend, beating <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/x-men-origins-wolverine-review-its-all-about-hugh-jackmans-muscles/">&quot;Wolverine&quot;</a> by a million light-years. Here&#8217;s the scoop from <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=19&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>: </p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-review-reboot-takes-off-at-warp-speed/">Star Trek</a>, $75.20M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/x-men-origins-wolverine-review-its-all-about-hugh-jackmans-muscles/">X-Men Origins: Wolverine</a>, $26.40M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/ghosts-of-girlfriends-past-preview-trailer/">Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</a>, $10.25M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/obsessed-2-clips-including-the-beyonce-ali-larter-catfight/">Obsessed</a>, $6.56M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/17-again-review-sweet-and-funny/">17 Again</a>, $4.23M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nextdayair-movie.com/">Next Day Air</a>, $4.11M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/the-soloist-preview-trailer/">The Soloist</a>, $3.94M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/monsters-vs-aliens-review-awesome-3d-animation/">Monsters vs. Aliens</a>, $3.26M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/earth-review/">Earth</a>, $2.66M</li>
<li><a href="http://www.filmgecko.com/hannah-montana-the-movie-review/">Hannah Montana: The Movie</a>, $2.19M</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Image: © Paramount Pictures</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.filmgecko.com">Film Gecko</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmgecko.com/star-trek-rules-box-office-universe-may-8-10-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>